Thursday, December 4, 2008
Hillsborough County Successes
It is the largest success of the Hillsborough County residents that they successfully dethroned you as the Supervisor of Elections. The hundreds of voters missing over half the ballot, the lack of equipment at the University of South Florida that had students waiting in line four hours after the polls closed, and numerous other instances so eloquently showed how unprepared you were for this election.
What happened that so many poll workers were overwhelmed and unprepared that their lack of preparedness actually turned voters away especially in black neighborhoods were Obama was expected to win? Thank God for Kathy Castor asking the attorney general to intervene or else who knows how long this mess could have unraveled. The true success of the election was that Phyllis Busansky walked away the new Supervisor of Elections. Hopefully, Busansky is up to the challenge of breaking down the wall that Mr. Johnson put between himself and the public creating such a secretive office. Busansky has her work cut out for her, but at least this could be a step in the better direction.
It is still unseen if the Board of Education and Superintendent MaryEllen Elia can creat a success next year of the failure that has been the county school bus routes. After revamping the bus system this past school year, hundreds of confused and irate parents voiced off against the school system and called for change. Elia plans to hold off next year on revamping any more bus routes, but hopes to overhaul the current changes to address the problems brought forth by parents. One positive to come out of this whole debacle was the fact that the school system managed to eliminate a good number of bus stops, yet filled up their buses and got all students to the school on time. For the sanity of many parents next year, let's hope that next year isn't as entrenched with problems as it has been this year.
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Jim Norman
Norman first ran for election for the county commission in 1992. In the republican primaries, Norman faced off against Gordon Davis and Harry Sexton. Norman ran on the platforms to bring a strong commitment to education and the judicial system. Also, Norman stated that he’d like to work with the sheriff’s office to make sure violent offenders stay in jail while looking at ways to get non-violent, bondable offenders in programs like community control to free space for the more violent prisoners.
After winning in the primaries, Norman went on to face Democratic opponent James P. Doyle. After a recount of the election results, Norman had beat out Doyle by 227 votes and on Nov. 6, 1992, Norman was declared the winner of the county commission seat for District 2, which covers north-central Hillsborough County. After successful re-elections each year, Norman could no longer run for District 2 due to term limits that would not allow him to serve past 2001. Instead, Norman ran for the District 5 countywide seat and managed to defeat Stacey Lynn Easterling with 54.8% of the vote.
During his election for the District 5 post, Norman was involved with a lawsuit leveled against himself, Emeline Acton, Thomas Scott, Gary Trombley and Morris Weinberg by the Times Publishing Company. The lawsuit came about when in August of 1998, Norman and Scott were subpoenaed to appear before the federal grand jury of the Middle District of Florida. The grand jury was investigating irregularities related to a potential vote by the Board of Commissioners on the lien authority of Tampa General Hospital. County Attorney Emeline Acton advised Norman that legal representation was not available to him through the county due to the nature of the subpoena. Norman then retained Weinberg to represent him without the help of the county. Norman appeared before the grand jury on September 15. After the case was over, on May 5, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners determined that the expenditures of Norman arose out of his performance as an official for the county and that he should be reimbursed for his legal fees. On June 28, 1999, reporter David Karp of the St. Petersburg Times issued a public records request for all materials related to the payment of Norman’s lawyer for the case. County Attorney Emeline Acton delivered a letter to Karp informing him that the public records he requested were not in the hands of the county, but in the hands of the attorneys that represented the commissioners. The county argued that the attorneys were in the private sector and not subject to public records requests. The court applied factors from the case New Sun-Sentinel v. Schwab, Twitty, & Hanser and determined that a contract between a private entity and a governmental agency does not subject the private entity to the Public Records Act. Norman walked away from the trial without having to hand over anything to the Times.
In May 2006, Norman’s office confirmed that he underwent heart bypass surgery. Speculation had arisen when Norman had missed government meetings as to what was happening with him. He issued a statement after undergoing the surgery to alleviate his wife Mearline from any added stress from the media.
After moving to the District 5 post, Norman seemed to get himself into the middle of a lot of hotly contested issues at the Board of County Commissioners. In 2006, Norman proposed that the county spend up to $70.5 million in tourist tax dollars at Tampa’s three main sports venues, the Times Forum, Raymond James Stadium and Legends Field. Norman discovered that a tax on people who book hotel rooms in Hillsborough County are charged an extra 5 cent tourist tax for every dollar of their room charge, which a portion of goes toward paying off loans that financed the Times Forum and Raymond James Stadium. Norman also discovered that the tax raised more than was needed to meet the loan obligations. He suggested that the money be put toward upkeep of the arenas so that taxpayers would not have to pay for it. Moreover, Norman warned that annual multimillion-dollar losses by the Lightning could prompt its parent company, Palace Sports and Entertainment, to sell or the move the team, which would leave the county-owned Times Forum without a tenant.
A few days after his initial proposal of using tourist tax dollars, the Hillsborough County Commission voted to give the city of Tampa $6 million in tourist tax dollars to repair a leaky roof in the Tampa Convention Center. The move to release the money was prompted by Norman’s proposal of spending tourist tax dollars in the county’s main sports venues. The commission tried to tie the $6 million payout to aiding the Tampa Bay Lightning as well, but was not successful.
In March of 2007, Norman proposed that the commission expand residency restrictions for sex offenders to areas with high concentration of seniors. Norman was prompted to voice his concern after incidents involving sex crimes in the senior community of Sun City. Sex offenders were already banned from living within 1,000 feet of schools, playgrounds and other places where children congregate, but Norman worried that these restrictions would push them into areas that include other vulnerable residents such as seniors. Norman proposed that sex offenders also be prohibited from residing within 1,000 feet of areas officially designated as retirement communities such as John Knox Village and Sun City Center.
On April 18, 2007, the commission voted to tighten the restrictions of where sexual predators can reside. The county ordinance that was passed stated that convicted sexual predators are barred from going into or near seniors-only communities that request safety zone designation.
As the county commissioner assigned to the post of the Tampa Sports Authority, one of Jim Norman’s largest plans for the county was the proposed $40-million complex named Championship Park to be built north of Plant City. Norman suggested that the half-cent Community Investment Tax be used to construct the sports complex. A committee was assembled to research the viability of such a complex. Findings supported the fact that Tampa sports facilities were in overuse by 200 percent. The review committee supported Norman’s proposed Championship Park by stating that the complex could pay for itself and potentially make money.
However, by October when the commission was poised to vote on the proposed sports complex, Tampa citizenry so brazenly blasted the proposal due to the effects they would experience from the budget proposal that not one commissioner voted in support of Norman’s dream complex. As a show of sympathy for Norman’s crushed dreams, fellow commissioner Brian Blair suggested the Community Investment tax be used to improve existing parks rather than build new ones.
In November 2007, Norman was replaced as the commission chairman, a position that he had held for two consecutive terms, but was kept on at his Tampa Sports Authority post. A few months later in April 2008, Norman filed his papers to run for the state Senate District 10 seat in 2010. Fellow Republican and friend Rep. Kevin Ambler also filed for the same seat as Norman a day earlier almost guaranteeing an interesting race come 2010.
In response to the apparent recession in September 2008, Norman proposed giving county residents tax rebate checks to get them through the troubling financial times and help spur the economy. Norman suggested that the money could be given out due to the fact bids for county-road building jobs are coming in tens of millions of dollars below projections. It is unclear whether the rebate can happen since money for county-road jobs comes from sales taxes collected from residents and visitors with no way of identifying who paid how much and Norman has not offered insight as to who would get the refunds. If the refund were not plausible, Norman suggested lowering the gas tax to reflect lower costs; however, the chance to change that tax has already passed since it must be voted on by July 1 in order to go into effect Jan. 1.
Although winning the praise of the citizenry for his proposed tax refunds, Norman managed to outrage others with his proposal to put a name on the Moral Courage Award. The Moral Courage Award was instituted to recognize a citizen who challenged government or fought back against wasteful spending or flat-out wrongness. In September 2008, Norman suggested that deceased millionaire concrete magnate Ralph Hughes have his name attached to the award. Outraged citizens against the renaming of the award said that Hughes was more of a campaign contributor than an involved citizen working to make a change. However, five of the seven commissioners voted to rename the award to memorialize Hughes including Norman who had received funding from Hughes in past election bids.
Most recently, Norman has come under fire for his use of luxury suites at Raymond James Stadium. Norman railed against the head of the agency that runs Raymond James Stadium saying that he wanted salaries frozen and travel expenses slashed. Norman’s demands came after the Tampa Sports Authority hadn’t cut enough spending demanded by the public in desperate need of tax relief. The point of contention over Norman’s crys of cutting spending at Raymond James is that he does not seem to believe that his access to the luxury suite designated to the Tampa Sports Authority be cut. Norman asserts that the cost of the suite is justified because it is used as a marketing tool for the county boosting community relations and economic development. However tickets in the past seem to have gone to the same people as well as the same invited guests of ticket holders causing citizens to regard the suite access as a perk not necessary to county development.
Aside from his political life, Jim is married to Mearline Norman and they share a four-bedroom home built in 1978 on 4210 Carrolwood Village Drive in Tampa. Norman’s home has an assessed value of $191,043 to which he pays $3,560 in taxes.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Juvenile Court
Monday, November 17, 2008
NPO CARE Loses Funding
Nonprofit organization CARE has recently lost all of its government funding. CARE, which aims to fight global poverty, works alongside poor women whom they equip with resources to educate their family members and communities to escape poverty.
Like most nonprofit organizations, or NPOs, CARE receives 90% of its funding from donations from private persons; however, a small part of their budget comes from taxpayer dollars. Generally, state-run health and human service charities receive the largest amount of government funding. In the case of CARE that has concentrated its efforts recently in Haiti, they fall outside of the group of charities that work toward bettering the problems here in the United States and have seen their entire government funding cut.
CARE is one of the oldest NPOs in the nation having been created in 1945 to deliver aid to survivors of World War II. CARE seeks to deliver relief in emergencies and provide economic opportunity. CARE began its work with Haiti in 1954 to help those affected by Hurricane Hazel. However, since October, CARE has been working to help those affected by several tropical storms that hit the country this past summer. Tropical storms have damaged access to drinking water in many regions of Haiti and have affected the personal hygiene of many Haitian residents. On Oct. 8, CARE delivered to 1,500 families hygiene kits that included soap, toothbrushes, toothpaste, detergent and chlorine tablets to disinfect water.
The flood-ravaged regions of Haiti are in a severe crisis because the majority of municipal and community drinking water sources have been destroyed by storms. Also, the muddy terrain has left residents stranded in regions where there is no clean water sources. Haitian residents are left to drink or use contaminated water for cleaning and hygienic needs. The contaminated waters contain water-borne diseases that can lead to infections and have left many Haitians dead or near death.
CARE volunteers have targeted the most vulnerable groups of people in Haiti including children, pregnant women, single mothers, handicapped people and those affected by HIV/AIDS to educate Haitians on good hygiene practices as well as to distribute water purification tablets. CARE is concerned with passing out water purification tablets to many Haitians until they are educated on their use. CARE worries that tablets may be sold on local markets or destroyed if not put in the hands of the informed. CARE needs more money to expand their distribution services and has turned to the Internet to drum up resources. On the CARE Web site, those wishing to donate to the cause will be matched by private donors dollar for dollar.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Midterm II
The Florida Sunshine Laws are aptly named when you think about sunshine. When something is in the sunshine, it is out in the open. Florida Sunshine Laws state that all government proceedings are open to the public for inspection. Any public record created by a government agency is open to any person in the community for review. Public records are broadly defined by Florida statutes as all documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business by any agency. This broad definition is what gives Floridians such a unique set of public record laws. Other states do not have such lenient laws and may make requests for public documents nearly impossible. For example, a public record under Florida Statute 119.011 would make an e-mail sent from a county commissioner to city council a public record open to the community to inspect.
These Sunshine Laws have not come into being as a recent amendment to the state constitution, but in fact have been a part of the Florida constitution since 1909. Chapter 119 of the Florida Statutes was passed in 1909 and became known as the “Public Records Law.” This law provided that any records made or received by any public agency in the course of its official business are available for inspection, unless specifically exempted by the Legislature. Since the passage of this statute, the definition of public document has been reinterpreted throughout the years to adapt to the evolving means of communication.
Beginning in 1967, the Government-In-The-Sunshine Law was enacted and became a part of Chapter 286 of the Florida Statutes. This law went on further to say that Sunshine Laws also cover public meetings.The law establishes a basic right of access to most meetings of commissions, boards and other government bodies. Floridians have since been able to attend any government meeting where two or more publicly elected officials talk about any government proceedings. The Sunshine Laws even allow residents to attend meetings of the Legislature. When the problem of deciding to allow residents into Legislature meetings, an amendment was overwhelmingly passed by voters in 1990 to allow public access to legislative meetings.
To further the availability of public records and open meetings, Gov. Charlie Crist issued Executive Order 07-107 on June 19, 1997, creating the Commission on Open Government Reform. The commission is a nine member panel that was created within the Governor’s Office of Open Government The commission reviews, evaluates and issues recommendations regarding Florida’s public records and open meetings laws.
“Florida’s Sunshine Laws are among the strongest in the nation and give every citizen access to information necessary for participating in the democratic process,” said Governor Crist. “The Commission on Open Government will help ensure that all levels of government are accessible to the people.” Gov. Crist instructed the commission to review policies pertaining to Article 1, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution as well as Chapters 119 and 286.011. The findings of the commission will be presented to the Governor, the Senate President, and the Speaker of the House representatives on December 31, 2008.
The commission has set forth specific responsibilities to address concerning Sunshine Laws. The first responsibility is to review fees imposed for copying or reviewing public records. Problems have arose in recent times due to the advancement of technology. The commission is working to ensure that the public is receiving information for the least amount of money to produce such records. Another responsibility of the commission is to review the collection, storage, retrieval, dissemination and accessibility of public records through advanced technologies such as the Internet. Throughout this course, it has been seen that most records are available for inspection on the Internet; however, some records are still only available for inspection at the office in which they are housed.
The final responsibility of the commission is to review the policies regarding the public’s right to participate in agency’s meetings. The commission plans to see if under the Florida Constitution if the public has a right to speak at such meetings through the use of telephone, video conference,, or other remote electronic means.
In their August 2007 meeting, testimonies were given as to what areas the Sunshine Laws needed to address or be re-worked. One such testimony that was brought before the commission dealt with the secrecy of clemency files. Currently, clemency files are confidential in accordance with Rule 16 and Section 14.28 of the Florida Statutes. The statutes say that the clemency files are exempt from disclosure unless otherwise released by the Governor. The witness brought forth a testimony detailing how a juvenile in the wrong place at the wrong time was convicted of felony murder and was sentenced to life in jail without parole for 25 years. The witness spoke of testimonies from officers at the prisoner’s jail discussing good behavior and work towards education; however, his clemency was denied. The inmate will once again be able to apply for clemency, but since his lawyers do not know why he was denied the first time, then they cannot work toward rectifying the problem disallowing his chance at clemency.
Another testimony came from Joy Ezell who discussed the situations in Taylor County in regard to obtaining a public record request. Ezell had produced the request she had sent to her county government to obtain public records from her county government to any other governing body or the electric, utilities, or power agency concerning the proposed coal-fired power plant in Taylor County. Ezell stated that she had been denied access to county e-mails concerning county business related to the Taylor Energy Center. Ezell further went on to lay claims that the commission shrugs off all public records requests pursuant to situations concerning the company Proctor & Gamble/Buckeye. Ezell claims that the Taylor County government has been acting “out of the sunshine” for many years and that a change needs to come about in order to continue democracy in Taylor County.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Midterm
3. When Mr. Crist announces his bid for Congress, my immediate reaction would be to look into his performance as a state senator. I would want to know how he voted on certain issues and would turn to my Supervisor of Elections to scan over voting history. I would specifically be looking for items that he voted on that may in fact contradict the campaign that he is running. If Mr. Crist were purporting himself to be pro-life, I would want to find cases where he had voted to uphold such cases as Roe v. Wade or a woman’s right to privacy. Next I would want to know who has donated to his campaign. I would use the Web site opensecrets.org to see how much Mr. Crist has spent on his campaign as well as how much he has raised. In addition to his money raised, I would be looking to see who his contributors were both personal and businesses. I would especially look to the business contributors to see if Mr. Crist might be greatly influenced in his job by certain industries. If Mr. Crist did in fact have certain industries contribute large amounts of money to his campaign, I would then turn to the Web site sunbiz.org. I would be searching to see if Mr. Crist has any businesses under his name that may in fact be a part of the industry that is contributing so much money to his campaign. In order to make sure that no illegal activities were occurring in regard to his campaign donations, I would want to cross-reference campaign contributors from opensecrets.org with companies that Mr. Crist may own or be owned by a large contributor from one of the industries backing Mr. Crist. In essence, I would try to find out if companies that would benefit from Mr. Crist making it into Congress were forcing their employees into donating to the Crist campaign. The main focus of my efforts would ultimately be to see if Mr. Crist would be unbiased in his work in Congress or if certain lobbyists or groups would sway him. I would look into any form of PAC contribution or 527s. I would try to follow the money as best as possible first from the documents kept by the campaign itself and trying to see who is listed as the donor. I would then try to do background searches on these individuals using such tools as AutoTrack to find out who they were and what assets or companies they may hold that would be affected by Mr. Crist’s election to Congress. In order to determine that Mr. Crist is qualified for the job in Congress, I would want to look into employment history. I would seek out his employment records as a state senator to see how long he has worked for the state as well as how much he has made. In addition, I would try to seek out employment information before becoming a state senator to determine if he has worked in the community long enough to understand the needs of the people he will be representing.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
News Center
Public Meeting #3

Imagine that your mother has just collapsed on to the floor and is non-responsive. Are you going to call several ambulance companies to determine what the best rate is to transport your mother to the hospital. You may consider it after recent government action. On Oct. 8, the Hillsborough County Public Transportation Committee heard arguments from local ambulance operators on keeping a $25 surcharge on transportation bills. The ambulance companies adopted the surcharge to offset the high price of gas in recent months. Commissioner Brian Blair called the surcharge excessive and questioned if it was the commission’s duty to step in and monitor the ambulance charges.
American Medical Response spokesperson Nancy Castellano came before the commission to discuss the adoption of the surcharge. Castellano explained that despite a $10 charge per mile of the transport that patients are not charged for services offered by the medical technicians that operate the ambulances. For example, if a stretcher or CPR is required, a patient is not charged for these instances. Furthermore, the vehicles are left running the entire time of the transport. If a patient needs medical attention on the scene and then needs to be loaded on a stretcher, the ambulance is left running outside the property to continue running medical equipment and the air conditioning. All of these incurrences are at the expense of the ambulance company and are not charged to the patient. Castellano believes that due to high gas prices in recent months that the $25 surcharge is acceptable to offset the prices of diesel fuel that the ambulances require.
Commissioner chairman Kevin White noted that the commission has oversaw the implementation of surcharges in both the taxi and tow truck service industries and that it should be their duty to oversee the ambulance division as well. The commission approved a $1 surcharge on taxi fare and a $10 surcharge on tows to offset gas prices. The charges were adopted in April when the average price of gas was $3.69 a gallon. Since the adoption, gas prices have seen a steady decline leaving Commissioner Blair to ask if the ambulance surcharges were justified or just plain greed. The commission was unable to come to a conclusion on the validity of the surcharge and decided to postpone a judgment and put it on the agenda for next month’s meeting. Since the next month’s meeting was cancelled due to commissioners having previous obligations, the ambulance surcharge will remain in effect for at least two more months.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Tax Collector's Office
In regards to their Powerpoint presentation, I believe that they did an excellent job on helping me to further understand the meaning of items on tax documents. Before listening to their lecture, I had researched tax records and had been bogged down by the legal jargon. Preston easily described what each item meant and what its value was in regards to a news story. In addition to addressing navigation of their website, I especially paid heed to Preston’s lecture on what items would be best to research when gathering together a news story. His list of public records used for creating a story got me to think about what documents I should request for my public figure biography. I was aware form previous lectures as to what documents were available to me, but was still confused as to how they were accessed and who could offer them to me.
My only concern with the lecture was that I became a bit lost in all the discussion of numbers including homestead exemptions and tax credits. I’m not completely sure how to integrate that into a story and was therefore thoroughly confused as to the mathematic equations. If it were possible, I believe that examples of why these exemptions would make a story newsworthy were offered that it would aid my understanding of the process. For example, if a discussion detailed how someone may have used the homestead exemption to benefit themselves when in fact they abused the system.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
William March
The major difference that I saw in the presentation by Mr. March in comparison to other presenters or other classes that I have taken is the fact that he did an excellent job of tying together the research tools to practical use in a newsroom. In previous classes, I learned about many research engines online or public records requests, but reviewing my returned data seemed to wield nothing but figures and general information on the case. Mr. March gave me the insight to not only read the facts, but to read into the fats and question the data in front of me. In addition to reading into the facts, he proved that it was beneficial to crosscheck the facts with other data to see if anything was awry. Mr. March’s presentation was one of the most empowering lectures on being an enterprising journalist.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Public Meeting #2
Despite a complete budget cut for their group, the Commission on the Status of Women has soldiered on in raising awareness about women in Hillsborough County. During their recent Sept. 22 meeting, the group decided what the future would hold for their involvement in the county. “It’s going to be a struggle today to determine how to continue the group in a creative way financially,” said group secretary Felicia Crosby-Rucker. The end of the week would mark the end of the budget period at which point any funds left in their department would be absorbed into a pool by the county. The commission struggled on how to spend their remaining budget effectively by producing brochures and reports of recent research conducted on women in Hillsborough County.
Group member Susan Leisner urged members of the commission to create a work plan for the coming year. Leisner pointed out that the creation of a work planner would aid the commission in receiving money from the county’s biannual budget and keep the commission on task. Ideas for the upcoming year’s work planner included suggestions listed in their research documents on how to better the female population in Hillsborough County. “We have these suggestions from our research as to how to better the community, but what good are they if we don’t use them,” questioned group leader Cindy Kane. The commission delved into their research and decided to address the issues of women’s healthcare and children’s healthcare in the coming year.
For the first quarter of the calendar year, the commission hopes to address women’s healthcare issues by offering workshops that would highlight issues such as diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular care. Since the commission cannot give money directly to non-profit organizations, they aim to team up with existing organizations to offer services to the community through workshops. Commission members plan to teach workshops and offer guidance to local women in hopes of increasing preventative care of health-related issues. In the second quarter, the commission plans to address issues involving children’s healthcare. The commission hopes to highlight growing issues amongst children and families regarding immunizations. Growing fears over families deciding not to immunize their children due to side effects prompted the commission to believe that entire classrooms could become infected with contagious diseases. The commission hopes to intervene with preventative care measures that address the benefits of childhood immunizations through workshops.
The commission will hold their next meeting on Oct. 27. On the agenda is a presentation from the Housing Commission detailing incoming foreclosure funds.
Clerk of Courts
In addition to my newfound knowledge of the services offered to the public, I was interested in the facts detailing marriage licenses. I really enjoyed the fact that the office offers a discount on marriage licenses to those who partake in a pre-marital class. It was astounding at how many marriage licenses that the office issued in a year and I believe that pre-marital counseling will help to keep those marriages intact and possibly decrease the office’s call center’s calls for annulment assistance. In fact, I was amazed at how many calls the switchboard receives in a day. Before taking this class, I was unaware of the services available to me. It was pleasing to read that many citizens use the services offered to them by the Clerk of Courts.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Orient Jail
Once I got past the fact that we were amongst criminals charged with a multitude of different crimes, I became amazed at the professionalism of the Orient Jail workers as well as the amazing detail they put into dealing with criminals. The process of booking a person into the jail was very simply put by our guide and shed light on a process that I was unfamiliar with. Not only did I learn how people were booked into the jail, but I learned that throughout the entire process their actions are documented. The documented actions would be a great supplement to a story about a recently arrested criminal. In addition to a police report obtained from the Sheriff’s office, I could also use a Criminal Incident Report from the jail to add to my story.
I’m still a bit unclear as to how much video is open to the public. As our guide told us, the video of the inmate being tossed from his wheelchair was all over the news, but would a video clip of a prisoner in lockdown be able to be released to the public. When we went into lockdown and witnessed the prisoner on suicide watch, I wondered if the video that was being filmed from the corner would be able to be shown in the nightly newscast if the prisoner was of prominence.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Hillsborough Sheriff's Office
My trip to the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office was very informative in regards to where I could go to find public records related to criminal incidents. Before my visit to the office, I was under the impression that if an item was not available on the sheriff office’s Web Site that I could only obtain such information from the public library. My knowledge of where to obtain pubic records was very small before my participation in this class and the visit to the sheriff’s office was very beneficial.
Not only was I able to learn where I could obtain crime-related reports, but I learned about what types of information was available to me. I took great interest in the fact that search warrants are open to public inspection and include rather detailed information that could create a great lead-in for a developing news story. In addition to search warrants, I learned a great deal about incident reports. Before my visit, I surmised what had occurred from the brief information located on the arrest report online. The incident report would be a great research tool in regards to developing the events of the story. I especially enjoy the narrative style incident report written by the police officer on the final page of the report.
It probably wasn’t what Mr. Calloway intended, but his admission that it was possible for journalists to be on top of a story if not ahead of the police by listening to police scanners. Before thinking of a police scanner as a useful tool in learning where a good story might be, I associated scanners with nosy neighbors. Also, it was very good to know that videotape taken within the police station could be subject to public records. I am now debating the idea of requesting video of some friends’ arrests.
Public Meeting #1
Most of the cases that were addressed did not have a witness or defendant present despite the fact that they were told about today’s meeting and eventual ruling. In regards to burglar alarm cases, most of the cases were in violation of County Ordinance 04-16 Section 10-B-4. Section 10-B-4 details the fact that when a residence that contains a burglar alarm goes off falsely, then it is the responsibility of the property owner to pay a fine for police services in addressing the false alarm.
Generally, the fine for most cases ranged between $100 and $150. However, if a property owner did not pay the fines for a false alarm, then the magistrate would determine whether to impose more fines. In most cases a $25 a day fine would be imposed until the original fine was paid. In one case, Dorothy Ferguson arrived to present her case as to why her fine was not paid. In her case, there was no clear understanding of an annual fee that was to cover false alarm fines. Her fine was cut in half and was paid at the court.
One case that stood out to me that seemed newsworthy was the case of James V. Cadicamo. The false alarm fines imposed upon him totaled over $4000 and were still unpaid. Instead of James Cadicamo appearing to present his reasoning why he did not pay the fines, his father Vincent Cadicamo arrived on his behalf. Vincent claimed that he had information that linked the false alarm on a situation where the FBI broke into his son’s home in order to arrest his son. Vincent had tried to get in touch with the FBI in efforts to resolve this isssue before appearing before the magistrate, but did not receive any response from the FBI. The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office does not have a record online of James’s recent arrest; however, he does have one charge of domestic battery.
The final case that I witnessed involved a solid waste management case that the county had brought against Creative Concrete & Excavation. The company had been operating in Brandon, Fla. as a solid waste collector by collecting and disposing of its excavation trash. The county has a system set up where only three comapanies are allowed to compete for solid waste removal. Creative Concrete in that regard had no legal right to begin collecting trash from the curbside of its Brandon excavation sites..
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Matt Doig
In addition to learning about the capabilities of investigative reporting to enact change, I learned about use of public records. Unless I believe it to be a long-running or story of great importance, I believe I will steer clear of requesting national public records. The case of the 9/11 terrorist plane instructor was a great anecdote in describing the length of time it takes some national records to arrive in a journalist’s hands. In contrast, Doig did encourage me to not give up when it came to my quest of unearthing public documents. He made it seem that if you pressed hard enough and threw the law books at agencies that you were requesting records from that sooner or later they would cave in to your request.
One topic that I would have liked Doig to go into more detail about would have been doing investigative work in other states. I would move out of Florida for a job and am a bit nervous when it comes to being understanding of other state’s public records law. If I were to move to another state, would I have to learn the state’s system specifically or are there standards which apply nationally that I could adhere to.
Monday, September 8, 2008
Adria Gonzalez
From the presentation by Adria Gonzalez, I learned a great deal about what may happen in real life circumstances when it comes to requesting public affairs records and how to resolve such problems. I worried about possible fees when it came to requesting records. My concerns entailed how legal it was for agencies to charge fees and what would be considered reasonable when it came to paying for such fees. I also was unaware of how much information I needed to present to agencies when requesting such records. I feared that if it were known that I was part of a press agency that I would be denied public records based on my occupation.
Adria’s organization the First Amendment Foundation will be a great outlet if I ever need help in disputing a request for public records. It is always troublesome when you encounter a problem with a company and no one is able to resolve it that works within the company. Adria’s company will be a great go-to when it comes to finding avenues to get the records that I need. Not only will her agency be a great service if I encounter problems, but also Adria gave great tips when encountering a roadblock by putting everything in writing that you produce and getting every problem from a company put into writing so that you can forward it to the attorney general and local news agencies which would hopefully help resolve the problem.
Only because of time constraints did this occur, but I feel the presentation did not cover Sunshine Laws thoroughly.